Build on a decent foundation
SEBI’s REIT Regulations are on the right lines but the rules need tweaking.
Oct 19, 2013
Source : The Hindu


MUMBAI: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has put up SEBI (Real Estate Investment Trust) Regulations, 2013 for public comments.

While there is definitely a case for REIT, given the immense potential it offers investors to earn safe income from the burgeoning market for commercial properties in India, some features of the draft regulations are bound to raise eyebrows.

Only REITs with a minimum asset size of Rs 1,000 crore are entitled to make an initial public offer. This makes the job of the sponsor onerous or attractive, depending upon who he is.

If he is a genuine real estate developer, he may find it difficult to find cash of such staggering magnitude, unless he joins hands with other developers to form a consortium of sponsors.

But if he harbours considerable black money seeking an investment outlet, the requirement would be a godsend, like the discredited Participatory Note mechanism under the SEBI’s FII dispensation.

One hopes this is not a scheme designed to be winked at by the powers-that-be. Public offers should be allowed to be made at a lesser asset size threshold. However, sponsor investment at all times should be at least 25 per cent of the capital to bring about seriousness on their part. This will provide an assurance to the public that they are not fly-by-night operators.

IPO specifications

It must also be ensured that investors who are called upon to fork out a minimum Rs 2 lakh comprising two units each bearing a face value of Rs 1 lakh at the time of initial public offer are not made to pay a premium.

All that the draft says is the minimum issue size should be Rs 250 crore. It must be made clear that no premium can be charged from investors in an IPO in keeping with the parallel provisions in mutual fund investments.

A new fund offer (NFO) by a mutual fund scheme has to be at a standard rate of Rs 10 per unit, that is its face value.

Likewise, a unit of REIT should also be offered only at par on IPO lest sponsors extort money from public investors a la the promoters of companies making IPOs — they subscribe at par but call upon the public to pay mind-boggling premiums, even though the company has not gone on stream, leave alone made a rupee of profit!

That a REIT must invest 90 per cent of its corpus only in completed projects might make its investments a tad expensive, though the intention admittedly is in public interest — investments in work-in-progress are fraught with risks, including feet-dragging by municipal authorities in granting completion and fitness certificates.

A little more latitude must be given so that REITs can nurse an investment in property from its infancy. That would morph them into the role of active builders with attendant cost benefits, as opposed to the role of passive purchasers that the regulations seem to condemn them to.

Freedom to invest up to 25 per cent in work in progress as well as new projects would have struck a golden mean and steered clear of the extreme caution or extreme risk taking.

Quarterly valuations

This cautious stance of the draft regulations flies in the face of another provision that allows a REIT to put all its eggs in one basket — in a single completed project if its size is not less than Rs 1,000 crore in terms of value.

A REIT is nothing but an extension of mutual fund, though it is supposed to cater to high net worth individuals and institutions such as provident and pension funds alone, what with an entry barrier of a stiff Rs 1 lakh investment per unit.

One of the abiding principles of mutual fund investment is diversification and the permission to put all eggs in one basket is antithetical to this principle.

The compulsion to list the units in bourses is welcome, but the market could be clueless as to the true worth of the investment portfolio of a REIT in the absence of publication of NAV at frequent intervals.

The regulations mandate publication once in six months.

To be sure, unlike a mutual fund investing in shares that can easily publish NAV every day as is mandated for an open-ended scheme, it would be impossible for a REIT to do so on a continuous basis.

But six months is too long an interval that could only encourage speculation in the bourses. Quarterly valuations would be a golden mean.

One also wonders at the wisdom of the leeway given to REITs to borrow up to 50 per cent of their assets, though the moment the borrowings cross 25 per cent, credit rating has been mandated.

Ideally, a collective investment scheme should not have the freedom to borrow. It should be debtless or debt-free.

Freedom to borrow could goad a REIT to indulge in a bit of brinkmanship inimical to the spirit of collective investment.

If the above shortcomings are removed, REIT would be an excellent investment tool for those looking for attractive but safe returns, oxymoronic as that might sound. If the REIT enters into a water-tight contract with its tenants, the threat of bad debts would be minimal.

Given the burgeoning commercial property market in India which is bound to witness a staggering growth on the back of the Food Security legislation calling for massive investments in warehouses, rental income is what the doctor has ordered.

There is no reason why the provident fund managers should not be allowed to park a sizeable portion of their funds with REITs.

Their reluctance to invest in share market is understandable, but they would lap up the REIT opportunity with two eager hands.

Latest Realty News

REITs: Can it revive realty sector?
Oct 19, 2013
MUMBAI: The capital markets regulator has notified the draft regulations for Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), a long-standing demand of the realty sector. This marks a key step in bringing greater transparency and professionalism in the industry.
National building code with green norms will be ready by March
Oct 19, 2013
MUMBAI: The country will have a fine-tuned National Building Code by March next year. This addendum to the original building code will incorporate green building norms among other aspects, according to Prem Chand Jain, Chairman of Indian Green Building Council.
Case against Omaxe’s Patiala project dismissed
Oct 19, 2013
DELHI: Omaxe City, a joint project by Omaxe Ltd and Punjab Urban Planning Development Authority PUDA), is set to see the light of the day as the petition challenging the veracity and legality of the project was dismissed by Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Why we buy homes during festive season
Oct 19, 2013
DELHI: Why do we see such a deep significance in buying a home during the festive season? Is it really only about the freebies and schemes that some developers offer?
Dwarka sub-city residents prefer moving to larger homes within locality
Oct 19, 2013
DELHI: Dwarka sub-city is mainly an end-user driven market with the whole infrastructure up and running. It is well-connected with Metro Rail and airport, and a destination of choice for home buying.
Green Tree ropes in COWI India as structural designer
Oct 19, 2013
CHENNAI: Green Tree Homes & Ventures Pvt. Ltd., one of the leading real estate developers in the state, today announced a strategic alliance with COWI India Private Ltd., an ISO 9001: 2008 certificated company providing engineering services in the fields of Roads & Airports, Railways, Tunnels & Bridges, Marine Engineering and Buildings. COWI India will be the Structural designer for Green Tree’s 101, 1001 and 201 projects.
Century 21 real estate continues global expansion
Oct 19, 2013
DELHI: Century, the franchisor of the world’s largest residential real estate sales organization, today announced its expansion in India with the signing of a master franchise agreement to open CENTURY 21® franchises in India. Alchemist Group has become the master franchisor of the CENTURY 21 System for India operating as CENTURY 21 India.
Mumbai Real Estate: Is a Leasehold Property Better Than Freehold?
Oct 18, 2013
MUMBAI: A leasehold property defines the status of the land on which the property is built. Leasehold land on which construction takes place is ordinarily on long-term lease of 99 years onward. Specific to residential property on leasehold land, one may use the example of the MMRDA’s Wadala development plan, wherein the land is given on long-term lease to various developers who can sell the units constructed on an outright basis. The developer ordinarily pays a substantial value for the long-ter
PMC to check 50k residential properties for commercial use
Oct 18, 2013
PUNE: Nearly 50,000 properties in the city will be screened from November for commercial use of residential properties. The civic administration hopes to increase property tax revenue by Rs 50 crore.
MCG gets nod to resume property tax collection
Oct 18, 2013
DELHI: After months of deliberation, the special committee appointed by the state government was finally able to clear the property tax muddle late on October 16, paving the way for the municipal corporation to resume tax collection in Gurgaon.

Latest Realty News Of State

Realty Talk's