Delivery of new flats: Delays can attract high penalty for developers
Recent court ruling relieves buyers of the risk of being duped by developers.
Oct 21, 2013
Source : The Times of India


MUMBAI: Even before the real estate regulator is formed, consumer courts are taking the lead in establishing the best practices for the sector. On the most common issues — developers taking more than the time they promised in which to deliver a flat — consumer courts are coming down on the side of the buyers.

This time we examine a recent judgment by Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to figure out if it has a wider application for others in a similar situation. The recent judgement puts the onus of delay beyond reasonable limits on the developers and relieves the buyers the risk of being duped by developers when they renege on their promise.

The case

The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in a judgement on September 13, gave a landmark decision in favour of the buyer Anant Ieetkar. Ieetkar had booked a flat in December 2008 in Kalyan, an extended suburb of Mumbai, and paid approximately Rs 19 lakh to the developer. The flat was supposed to be delivered by September 2010. The project was in limbo for years. Construction had not begun. Ieetkar waited until 2011. Eventually, he filed a complaint with the commission.

In his complaint, Ieetkar alleged negligence on the part of the developer in not handing over possession by the promised date. He asked for delivery of the unit, additional charges for the mental harassment he was put through, and the interest payment as per the agreement. In his complaint, Ieetkar also provided documentary proof of the current market value of the flat from a valuer.

The developer admitted to receiving full payment for the flat and that construction would begin “as soon as possible” after getting requisite permissions.

The commission called this case as the “best example how the developer exploits the prospective purchasers” and ordered the developer to pay the current market value of a flat with the same specification in the same locality, which would be around Rs 60 lakh, in case the unit was not delivered within three months. In addition, the commission also directed the developer to pay Ieetkar Rs 3 lakh as compensation for mental harassment and Rs 30,000 for legal charges.

In its judgement, the commission quoted a judgement from the Supreme Court, which held that “while quantifying the damages, consumer fora are required to make an attempt to serve ends of justice, so that compensation is awarded, in an established case, which not only serves the purpose of re-compensating the individual, but which also at the same time, aims to bring about a qualitative change in the attitude of the service provider”.

According to Uday Wavikar, the lawyer representing Ieetkar, compensating the consumer at the current market value will increase consumer’s trust in the system. “In earlier judgements, consumers were merely granted a certain amount of interest on the principal amount paid. In reality, no amount of interest is enough, considering the rising real estate rates. But with a compensation like this, a consumer can at least consider buying a house in the same area,” says Wavikar.

Consumer forums across the country are lined up with similar complaints against developers. But as the Ieetkar judgement shows, such wilful default on the part of developers would now entail a heavy price.

Some developers agree. “Dedicated execution is of utmost importance to ensure timely delivery,” says Ram Raheja, director S Raheja Realty, a Mumbai-based developer.

“The key factor for delays in majority of the cases is cash flow. The diversion of funds is an unethical practice but it may not be true for all developers. I believe that defaulters should be punished. However, the buyers also have to be very diligent and should ensure they get the documents, especially the approvals checked by professionals,” adds Raheja.

The Checklist

Even as the judgement in this case could inspire more complaints, it is not yet a settled question of law as it can be potentially appealed with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and finally, the Supreme Court.

Let us take the example of a flat, say 1,000 sq ft in 2007 in Borivali, Mumbai. The going rate then was Rs 6,000 per sq ft. The agreement says the year of possession in March 2010. The developer, however, does not hand over

the keys until March 2013 as the work is not complete. When the buyer asks reasons for the delay, he is presented with an option: take back the Rs 60 lakh paid from 2007 to 2010.

The buyer had two choices then. One, he may wait indefinitely for the project to complete, as he has already exhausted his funds. Two, he can take Rs 60 lakh back and look for other options.

This is also not possible as the rates in the area have doubled and he will get a far smaller unit for the same price at that locality. This buyer in this case has lost both the house and time. The developer will sell the same flat to another buyer at the current market value say Rs 12,000 per sq ft and would make Rs 1.2 crore, an extra profit of Rs 60 lakh.

“In some cases, where the buyers are able to exert some pressure, the developers have paid about 10 to 12 per cent interest on the amount refunded,” says R Madan, an advocate who is fighting on behalf of buyers. “However, the interest was calculated from the date of possession mentioned in the agreement till the date of refund. The developers happily paid that interest as it was only for 2-3 years while they used the buyer’s money for 6 years without interest. On the other hand this interest was not substantial for the buyer to match the current market value of another flat in the vicinity,” adds Madan.

In India, sale agreements are usually prepared by the developers. The usual agreement for a standard under-construction project would usually indicate 3-4 years as the time-frame for completion. The buyer is bound to arrange the fund within this period while the developer is bound to keep his side of the deal and hand over the keys on the mentioned delivery date.

It is expected that the developer — being a businessman — must have considered all possible factors while finalising the cost and the time frame for delivery. “He has presumably paid for the land and cleared the legal title before


Latest Realty News

Corp's squad disbanded, illegal buildings flourish
Oct 21, 2013
KOCHI: The special squad constituted by the revenue wing of the corporation to check unauthorized constructions in the city was disbanded one-and-a-half years though it had unearthed 248 such instances in 2011. The corporation also failed to collect the fine slapped on building owners when it faced severe fund shortage.
Mayor discusses concession to be given in house tax
Oct 21, 2013
ALLAHABAD: Mayor Abhilasha Gupta conducted a meeting on Saturday regarding concession given in house tax and implementation of the advertisement policy.
Property expo begins, SRA looks to woo ‘reputed’ builders
Oct 21, 2013
MUMBAI: Even AS developers are busy trying to attract buyers at the annual property exhibition of the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry (MCHI), the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA), too, has set up its own stall to target big and reputed builders.
Realty prices at local ‘micro-markets’ double in 2 years in Delhi-NCR
Oct 21, 2013
DELHI: Property prices in NCR’s upcoming residential markets, which real estate experts term ‘residential micro-markets’, have nearly doubled in the last two years. This trend, analysts say, is owing to new options being made available in these micro-markets which has become an attractive proposition for buyers who can’t afford to enter the prime real estate market.
Soon, hi-tech tests to spot unsafe buildings in Mumbai
Oct 21, 2013
MUMBAI: In a first, some of the city’s dilapidated structures like schools and hospitals will undergo ultrasonic pulse testing and 3D scanning to detect where structural flaws lie.
Illegal to move into property without occupation certificate
Oct 21, 2013
MUMBAI: It is against the law to move into flats in buildings without the mandatory municipal occupation certificate (OC), the Bombay high court has ruled. A division bench of Justice S C Dharmadhikari and Justice Gautam Patel sought action against 49 flat owners as well as a nursing home in two wings of a building with six wings in Sion East.
Housing project delays: Roadmap to help you out of the logjam
Oct 21, 2013
KOLKATA: When Abhay Upadhyay applied for a 2-BHK row house in a project called Kolkata West International City in August 2006, he harboured the dream that his daughter, who was born a couple of months earlier, would grow up in a spacious, green and pollutionfree environment.
Indiareit's Khusru Jijina delivers on his mandate
Oct 21, 2013
MUMBAI: Khusru Jijina had to hit the ground running when around this time last year, Ajay Piramal cherry picked the old group loyalist to stabilise the operations at Indiareit Fund Advisors - the real estate venture capital fund of the diversified Piramal Enterprises that manages over a billion dollars of assets across a motley of eight domestic, offshore funds and third-party mandates.
Unitech inks Rs 1,000 crore office leasing deal with Accenture
Oct 20, 2013
DELHI: Realty firm Unitech Group has leased 8.1 lakh square feet of space in its under-construction Gurgaon IT SEZ to Accenture in a deal that will give Rs 1,000 crore of rental income over 15 years.
After a year, DDA to auction 60 plots in November
Oct 20, 2013
DELHI: After a gap of one year, Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has decided to put several plots under the hammer. Over 60 plots, in 14 different prime locations, will be auctioned at Dwarka, Pitampura, Vikas Puri, East of Kailash, Vivek Vihar etc on November 20, 21, 22, said a DDA official. The sale of brochures will begin from October 28.

Latest Realty News Of State

Realty Talk's