MCHI Credai moves court against VAT
The developers argued that they pay VAT for goods purchased during construction.
Oct 28, 2012
Source : The Times of India


MUMBAI: Two days before the deadline for developers to pay value-added tax (VAT) on October 31, the Bombay high court will take up a couple of petitions challenging the levy. Leading the charge is the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry-Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India (MCHI-Credai), the representative body of builders in the state, and the Pune-based Marathi Bandkam. Their petition backs up a PIL moved by Grahak Hitawardhini, a consumer organization in Pune. 
MCHI-Credai and Marathi Bandkam have argued that the government has ignored the fact that they constructed and sold flats under the Maharashtra Owners of Flats Act. "The building is constructed at our cost and without buyers having control over any activities of purchasing land to getting development permissions. The sale, thus, does not constitute a works contract and, hence, VAT cannot be levied,'' the petition said. 
The developers also argued that they pay VAT for goods purchased during construction. "The moment the goods are used in construction, they lose their status as goods and automatically convert into immovable property. Now, since developers execute agreement on flats, which are immovable property, VAT is not applicable on them and, therefore, it is not necessary for developers to get themselves registered," the petition to be heard on Monday said. 
The developers, like consumer organizations, pointed out that since stamp duty and registration fee are paid to the government on the sale of flat, VAT cannot be levied. They further pointed out that the government's move will create havoc and give rise to litigations between developer from buyers who have already received the possession long back. 
The developers' fears are not unjustified. Many buyers who have purchased flats in projects constructed by developers like Ekta, Lodha, Lakhani Kalpataru have either refused or are protesting the levy of VAT. In the New Haven project by Tata Housing at Boisar, the buyers have refused to pay VAT. ``We are not going to accept this VAT demand by Tata. How can Tata charge this tax levy on us when they have already collected upto 80% of the flat cost and the project is delayed by two years?'' flat buyers have written in a letter to Tata Housing. 
Notwithstanding the flat buyers protests, a four-member committee set up by MCHI-Credai have decided to charge 2.5% to 4.5% value-added tax (VAT) instead of 0.5% to 3% as computed by the sales tax department. ``We had no option but to arrive at this percentage due to high construction costs we incur,'' said a leading developer. 
More info: 
Main arguments in the Public Interest Litigation filed by consumer organisation 
- Levy is against article 14 of the constitution as owners are charged VAT at different rates although all of them have booked flats during under-construction. 
- Once the buyer pays the stamp fee for the transaction of the immovable property, VAT cannot be recovered by the builder from him/her. 
- Agreement to Sale, of the flat under construction, does not constitute SALE. It does not give the possession of the flat. It does not give the title to the property purchased. It only assures the sale of the property on certain future date and on completion of the construction of the flat. 
- The instalments paid under the agreement, are not "deferred payment of price" but are "advance payment of agreed price". The payment creates a charge on the property of the builder, which is not a sale, as defined under MVAT Act. 
- Though legal, electricity maintaince, deposits towards club house and other taxes are collected by the builder, they do not constitute cost of the flat. Though the developer gives final account of these deposits under MoFA after completing the project, the sales tax department is charging VAT on the incurring expenses on the above items. 
- The VAT levy of 5 per cent and 1 per cent for flats purchased from 2006 to 2010 and post 2010 is against the law as it includes the cost of land, an immovable property 
Composition Scheme | 
Section 42(3) of MVAT (preferred option of city builders) 
VAT payable where a builder subcontracts construction of a building of 20 flats Sale price | 25L each paid by 20 flat owners 
Total | 5Cr Less land value | 3Cr 
Less amount paid to subcontractor | 1.5Cr 
Less 30% on balance 50L owing to services such as labour, profit & architects fee | 15L 
Balance liable to tax | 35 lakh 
Total tax payable on goods purchased at 12.5% | 3.8L 
For each flat, the tax payable at 5% of Rs 3.8 lakh | 19,444 
- Ask the developer for a breakup of how the 5% VAT amount was arrived at. 
- Ask to see the developer's records or returns filed with the sales tax department Use the Right to Information (RTI) Act to find out whether a developer—who as per rules is deemed a dealer—has registered with the sales tax department. 
- Use RTI to access records of the VAT computed and paid by the developer against your building and flat 
- If the developer has collected excess amount, then ask to refund the excess with interest for the period it is lying with them. 
What Government Rules say?: 
Deadline for developers to make the payment: October 31 
Who has to pay: Those who have purchased under-construction properties between 2006 to 2010. 

Latest Realty News

Mumbai realty market sees upward trend in on-going festive season
Oct 28, 2012
Mumbai : The Mumbai realty market, one of the leading property market in the country, is witnessing an upward trend during the ongoing festive season after a long spell of slowdown owing to lack of approvals, high interest rate, price escalation and general downtrend in consumer demand.
Chief minister asks officials to speed up Greater Ranchi project
Oct 28, 2012
RANCHI: Chief minister Arjun Munda on Friday asked officials to expedite the Greater Ranchi project as delay will only lead to increase in cost.
DDA to invite views on farmhouse policy
Oct 28, 2012
NEW DELHI: Delhi Development Authority will start inviting objections and suggestions on the farmhouse policy from next week. According to sources, the public will have up to 90 days to respond to the proposal for regularizing over 2,700 farmhouses in the city by re-designating them "country homes".
Road to investment revolution
Oct 28, 2012
BHUBANESWAR: The city's fast expanding real estate, education and IT sectors are often cited as shining examples of Bhubaneswar emerging as a preferred investment destination.
Posh Palaspalli a picture of paradox
Oct 27, 2012
BHUBANESWAR: Palaspalli and the aerodrome areas in the city give a picture of social inequality despite rapid urbanization and growth.
Heaps of garbage leave Cuttack stinking
Oct 27, 2012
CUTTACK: Five days of festivities have left behind heaps of garbage and stench in the city. Tonnes of flowers, food packets, plastic bottles and polythene packets were found littered on Friday.
Over 1 lakh cops to get houses in Tamil Nadu
Oct 27, 2012
CHENNAI: Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa on Friday announced that the government headed by her had taken a policy decision to provide housing facilities for all uniformed services personnel in the State, numbering 1,12,363.
Investment in private sector high in Odisha: ASSOCHAM
Oct 27, 2012
Odisha continues to perch high among the States attracting maximum investment, ranking second after Gujarat in terms of share in private sector inflow, across domestic and international, as of June 2012, the ASSOCHAM stated on Friday.
3 reasons why the young should invest in real estate
Oct 26, 2012
One of the most frequent advices that can be given to the youth when it comes to investment is starting young. And just because, the advice is so frequent, most of us tend to forget that it is actually the BEST advice anyone can be given. Why is starting young so important? The answer is hardly rocket science. By the sheer luxury of time that youth has on hand in terms of the period of investm
Flat delivery failure: Ansal to pay Rs 14L
Oct 26, 2012
New Delhi: Ansal Landmark Township Pvt Ltd has been directed by a consumer forum here to refund Rs 13.33 lakh to a customer for failing to deliver him a two-room flat in time in its project "Sushant Royale" at Karnal in Haryana. The New Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum also awarded a compensation of Rs one lakh to customer Rohit Dhingra for the harassment caused to him. Th

Latest Realty News Of State

Realty Talk's