Too many loans for buying real estate can be risky
Mar 04, 2013
Source : Business Standard


There is a worrisome trend today. People take loans to acquire properties - not just for home for self use, but for investment in home and land. The current thinking among most investors is that property is the only asset that will give good returns. One may wonder - what is so worrisome about this? The point is that investors are going in for multiple properties, in many cases liquidating most of what they have and taking a loan for the rest.

We need to understand that most people have other loans and not just property loans. Many people also have vehicle loans. Some have personal loans, credit card repayments, consumer durable loans, and so on. Property loans go on for long periods. Hence, one has to consider all aspects thoroughly before going in for one. Also, in case of floating rate loans, the EMIs can go up. So, we find many people with multiple loans - their overall loan servicing burden goes as high as 80 per cent of their income, in some cases. When most of the income is going into servicing EMIs, even a small increase can be very difficult to service.

The second important point that we need to realise is that no asset class, including property, will perform forever. There is a school of thought that property prices can never come down. Some argue that even if it comes down, it can come down by 20-30 per cent, but not like equities. It is true that property prices may not come down by a huge percentage; but properties can remain stagnant for long periods, thereby, depressing returns. Like it happened between 1995-2003. So, there are price cycles in properties just like in every other asset class.

Gold is another favourite. About two years back the gold fever was at it's peak. Again, there are those who believe gold cannot come down at all. Gold has performed well in the past 10 years; but if you look at the past 30 years, the annualised returns would be in high single digits. That, too, is not due to gold returns; it is due to rupee depreciation.

The other aspect to consider is the return on investment in properties, in the holding period. For land, there is no return. For residential properties, the gross returns as a percentage of the property value would be 3-4 per cent. For commercial properties it can be double that. If one calculates the various outgoes like society charges, property taxes, income tax on the rent received, brokerage and so on, the net in hand would only be between 50-60 per cent of the rental income. So, every year one is earning only about 2 per cent on residential property and may be twice that for commercial properties. One is potentially losing 5-6 per cent in terms of returns, every year. The capital returns on the property has to make it up.

Other costs such as registration, stamp duty, brokerage and other incidentals add to the cost, but do not reflect in the value of property. Also, during the period when one is holding the property, the property has to be maintained, which is over and above the costs discussed earlier. At the time of liquidating the property, one also has to pay capital gains tax. Or else, one needs to invest in Capital gain bonds (yielding 6 per cent taxable return) or buy another residence to save tax.

However, many investors talk of creating an asset on borrowed capital and tax savings. While it is true that one is creating an asset using borrowed capital, one is also paying interest. Only for residential property the interest rate is benign at about 10.5 per cent and the real cost of borrowing can be low, if it is a second home. In case of commercial property, the cost of capital will be at least 3 per cent more than the residential home rate.

The loans taken to create such assets are long term loans, which means the borrower is assuming significant risk. One is making a commitment for a long period like 20 years to acquire a property, which is a huge risk.

What works for property investors is that, to begin with, people hold property for the long term. They don't look at the property prices every second day. Secondly, they also make consistent investments into it for years.

But, this kind of commitment would have worked well for other asset classes as well.

People are afraid of volatility. They do not realise that, ultimately, they should be concerned about returns over their holding period. Volatility is one of the accepted parameters of measuring risk. But given a long time horizon, volatility is less and less significant. That is, risk goes down as time increases, as one will be able to capture both up and down cycles that way. It will be even better, if one is investing regularly over time, as this will further ensure that the investor participates at all levels of the markets. Long term investment horizon reduces risk. This is an important fact to bear in mind while investing in assets prone to volatility and cycles. Most investors dread volatility and end up cashing in or out at the wrong time.

A portfolio is created to offer diversification, deliver returns after taking into account risk, liquidity, maturity profile and other considerations. No asset class will perform at all times. Only Fixed Deposits or fixed income products can always provide a stable and positive return. But the post-tax return, will be minuscule.

A good asset allocation should have equity, debt, property and other assets in the required proportion, based on the investor's needs. Moving from one to the other, just because one asset is performing well, will skew the portfolio.

Also, timing error will come in as we may not always be able to time correctly in terms of moving back and forth. Besides, there will be costs involved and there could be other issues like liquidity, taxation, tenure and so on. In essence, it is better to stay true to the desired asset allocation, save for any tactical calls of a minor nature.


Latest Realty News

Budget 2013: Will property become more affordable now?
Mar 04, 2013
If you are still waiting to buy your first house, the budget has some good news for you. The finance minister has extended an additional benefit of Rs 1 lakh on home loans up to Rs 25 lakh for first time property buyers.
Real estate regulator may not monitor commercial projects
Mar 01, 2013
in a move that may bring relief to developers, the Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation has decided to keep commercial offices and shops/malls out of the purview of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Bill.
Budget 2013: No proposal to benefit real estate significantly.
Mar 01, 2013
For the real estate sector this budget didn't provide any proposals which could benefit the sector significantly. Additional interest deduction of Rs 1 lakh for low cost housing (where loan taken is less than Rs 25 lakh) in addition to the current deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh should be welcomed by the sector.
Budget sees mixed reaction from industry and business groups in Orissa
Mar 01, 2013
Bhubaneswar, Feb 28: Several industry and business organisations in the State Thursday showed mixed reaction to the Annual Budget 2013-14 presented by Finance Minister P Chidambaram, Thursday. While measures in the sectors of agriculture, rural development, education, health care and women empowerment were highly commended, little offerings to small and medium scale enterprises (SMSE) and failure of Government in controlling deficit financing were criticised.
Budget 2013: Luxury homes for the rich to become more expensive
Feb 28, 2013
MUMBAI/BANGALORE: Luxury homes for the rich would become more expensive after the finance minister today reduced the abatement on service tax availed by real estate developers for homes and flats above 2,000 sq ft or costing Rs 1 crore and above to 70% from 75% earlier.
Budget 2013: A boost for affordable housing says Gagan Banga, Indiabulls
Feb 28, 2013
"One has to compliment the Finance Minister, Mr P Chidambaram, for addressing the nation's priorities in his budget for 2013-14," said Gagan Banga, CEO, Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd, adding, "he has presented a realistic and balanced budget, which is a good beginning."
Housing prices rise by up to 9.6 pc in 18 major cities: NHB
Feb 27, 2013
NEW DELHI: Housing prices have risen in 18 major cities, including Delhi and Mumbai, by up to 9.6 per cent during October-December period 2012 compared with the previous quarter, according to National Housing Bank (NHB).
Economic Survey 2013: Delays in clearances jack up property prices by 40%
Feb 27, 2013
New Delhi: Property prices in India shoot up by 40 per cent due to delays in starting of projects, which require 34 procedures to get clearance, taking an average of over six months time and the issue needs to be addressed, according to the Economic Survey.
What will Budget 2013 hold for the real estate sector?
Feb 26, 2013
Will Budget 2013 give the Indian real estate market enough lift to help it kickstart a sagging economy? Historically around the world real estate and infrastructure are sectors that can add a lift to the economy when it stagnates.
Credai holds training programme for members
Feb 25, 2013
PUNE: More than 450 real estate developers participated in a two-day training programme which the Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India (Credai), Maharashtra organized at Lavasa on Friday and Saturday. Members expressed their anxiety over negative policies of the government which delay completion of residential projects and add to the cost of homes.

Latest Realty News Of State

Realty Talk's